Wikinavedek:Pod lipo

Iz Wikinavedka, proste zbirke navedkov in pregovorov
Skoči na: navigacija, iskanje
Dobrodošli pod lipo!
Stran je namenjena splošnim razpravam in vprašanjem glede različnih vidikov slovenskega Wikinavedka. Preden zastavite vprašanje, prosimo, preglejte arhivirane teme. Tu ga objavite šele, če v arhivu ne najdete ustreznega odgovora. Pri objavi komentarjev se prosimo podpišite (uporabite ~~~~ ali kliknite ikono za podpis v urejevalni vrstici.)
Pod lipo


Prošnje za administratrostvo[uredi]

Če kdo spremlja to stran, naj si prosim ogleda Prošnje za administratorstvo. LP, --Klemen Kocjancic 08:13, 23 januar 2006 (UTC)

Link sploh ne dela strani sploh ni. --Darko Pes 07:48, 28 junij 2006 (UTC)

Request[uredi]

Hi, I am user meta:user:Walter. I respectfully request this community to consider my following request; I write a newsletter about what is going on in the Wikimedia projects in all languages. It is my hope that every community, like this one, has some people who read Wikizine. Then I can maybe receive some news from those readers about your project and in the other direction the can inform there community in your own language about the Wikimedia news possibly. I would like to ask this community to include on a relevant page a small banner for Wikizine. I could not find the local Village pump. Sorry if this is the wrong place for this.

If a banner is placed here on the correct page the change that someone here will think about Wikizine and report some local news will increase highly I suspect. Or that people will take a look and read the Wikimedia news. And maybe even share it locally. Here are the banners; meta:Wikizine/banners

My apologies that this is in English and the Wikizine is also in English. But there is not other way to do this. If there are questions please ask it here. I will be watching this page for two weeks from now on frequently. Greetings, --Walter 17:10, 20 julij 2006 (UTC)

Wikivir[uredi]

Povezava na Wikivir v "trenutnih spremembah" gre na angleški Wikisource. Sam nimam pooblastil, tako da ne morem popravit. --Darko Pes 08:23, 28 avgust 2006 (UTC)

Poleg tega bi bilo super če bi se nekdo (tudi sam bi če mi pustite) lotil prevajanja: special pages v posebne strani, torej da bi bilo vse prevedno kot na Wikipediji. --Darko Pes 08:25, 28 avgust 2006 (UTC)

Administratorstvo[uredi]

Rad bi kandidiral za administratorja (prevajanje, vmesnik ...), vendar ne vem, kam naj vložim kandidaturo. Kar na Wikinavedek:Prošnje za administratorstvo ali pa se to ureja na Meti, ker še pač nimamo nobenega birokrata? --Domen 14:26, 18 november 2006 (UTC)

Vsaka prošnja za status se mora izpeljati na matičnem projektu. V primeru, če na projektu ni birokrata (nam ga ne dajo, ker imamo premalo ljudi), je v primeru uspešno rešene prošnje, potrebno obvestiti stewarda, da podeli status. LP, --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Hitri odgovor) 16:12, 18 november 2006 (UTC)
Torej, je potrebno najprej na Wikinavedku kandidirati, da se podeli status ali gre brez tega (pač, ker sta na Wikinavedku aktivna samo dva + jaz, ti tu pa tam pogledaš, torej imamo 4 aktivne člane)? --Domen 16:16, 18 november 2006 (UTC)

Ja, najprej moraš tu postaviti kandidaturo, en teden mora teči, če je večina za, se obvesti stewarda. Sam sem dodal toliko strani, da smo na nekem nivoju, zdaj pa sem se spet vrnil na WP. LP, --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Hitri odgovor) 19:08, 18 november 2006 (UTC)

Evo, kandidatura vložena: Wikinavedek:Prošnje za administratorstvo/Dbc334. --Domen 19:21, 18 november 2006 (UTC)

Vorlander[uredi]

Zdaj ravno kategoriziram nekategorizirane strani in me zanima, ali je Vorlander oseba? Na angleški Wikipediji je našlo samo Vorlande ... --Domen 08:51, 2 december 2006 (UTC)

Vorlander je oseba, mislim da je Karl Vorlander. --Pasji pozdrav 08:57, 2 december 2006 (UTC)

Nikjer ga ne najde ... --Domen 09:15, 2 december 2006 (UTC)

Trenutni dogodki[uredi]

Povej mi ali mi potrebujemo Trenutne dogodke? Jaz bi najraje to stran izbrisal, Trenutni dogodki na levi strani v meniju pa preusmeril na Wikipedijo. Kaj praviš? --Domen 09:16, 2 december 2006 (UTC)

To bi bila ena opcija; kaj bi se dalo, da bi bila stran postavljena tukaj na Wikinavedku in se osveževala z Wikinavedka? --Pasji pozdrav 09:21, 2 december 2006 (UTC)

Ne. Bom izbrisal, iz menija pa naredil preusmeritev na Wikipedijo. --Domen 09:37, 2 december 2006 (UTC)
Urejeno. --Domen 10:22, 2 december 2006 (UTC)
Slabost je, da bodo potem uporabniki odhajali v Wikipedijo. Saj ne, da bi si bili striktno konkurenčni, a vseeno. --Pasji pozdrav 10:48, 2 december 2006 (UTC)
Ampak Wikipedijo tako vsak pozna ... na trenutne dogodke pa PMSM tukaj tako noben ne bo kliknil :-). --Domen 11:05, 2 december 2006 (UTC)
Drži; zaenkrat :) --Pasji pozdrav 11:35, 2 december 2006 (UTC)

Miran Ališič[uredi]

So dodani navedki res njegovi? --Domen 11:14, 2 december 2006 (UTC)

Kako bi pa to lahko preverili? Upal bi si trditi, da nekateri so. --Pasji pozdrav 11:35, 2 december 2006 (UTC)

Neznani je dodal še eno malo morje navedkov. --Pasji pozdrav 07:46, 4 december 2006 (UTC)

Najverjetneje je to iz Grand Brixov. Kako se uredi navedke če jih je velik, po času, temi? -Ta nepodpisani komentar je dodal/-a Sporti (pogovorprispevki).
Idealno bi bilo, da bi bili navedki urejeni časovno padajoče navzdol, tako da so najnovejši na vrhu. Drugače seveda pri pregovorih. --Pasji pozdrav 09:19, 29 januar 2007 (UTC)

Navajanje virov[uredi]

Ker smo Wikinavedek, torej zbirka navedkov, ki jih nekdo izreče ali zapiše, si jih ne moremo kar izmisliti. Zato sem pripravil stran Wikinavedek:Navajanje virov. Od zdaj naprej se je moramo striktno držati (upam, da lahko smernico spremenim v pravilo). Poleg tega pa sem še dodal opozorilo anonimnim urejevalcem na MediaWiki:Anoneditwarning. --Domen 16:44, 10 december 2006 (UTC)

Mislim, da mora ta "smernica" postati pravilo. Pravzaprav sem začuden, kako je možno, da ni bila to že od vsega začetka. Sicer je res, da so navedke dodajali večinoma zaupanja vredni uporabniki, toda še vedno lahko koga zanima, iz katere knjige ali časopisa je navedek - da bi knjigo denimo še sam prebral, če so navedki zanimivi. To pravilo bi moralo veljati za vse enako, in ne samo za anonimne prijavljene - točno bi se morali ravnati po njem tudi uporabniki, ki jim je priznano splošno zaupanje.--Lagos 18:11, 10 december 2006 (UTC)
Dodelil sem ji status pravila. Za nepreverjene vire dodaj ob njega {{NV}}, vzdrževalni seznam pa se nahaja pod zadnjimi spremembami. --Domen 21:11, 10 december 2006 (UTC)
Naj dodam še, da bodo izbrisani vsi navedki brez vira, ki so bili dodani po 10. decembru 2006. --Domen 19:02, 19 januar 2007 (UTC)

Mora bit link res na konec napisan? Ponavadi je dolg skoraj celo vrstico, tako bi bilo bolje, da ime medija kaže na ta link.

namesto

--Sporti 08:15, 23 februar 2007 (UTC)

Podpiram Sportijev predlog; že sam sem enkrat opozoril na to. --Pasji pozdrav 10:27, 23 februar 2007 (UTC)

Tudi meni se zdi to koristna sprememba, čeprav obstaja možnost, da bi v zgornjem primeru lahko link dodali recimo v "Albert Einstein".--Lagos 14:31, 23 februar 2007 (UTC)

Trije proti enemu vedno zmagajo, vendar jaz uporabljam za do štiri vire normalno s predlogo {{Viri}}, če jih je pa več, pa uporabim {{Viri okno}}. Poleg tega si pa oglejte še w:Posebno:Cite/Vlado Kreslin. --Domen 22:10, 23 februar 2007 (UTC)
Najboljša rešitev bi bila, da bi navedli samo domeno (npr. http://www.rtvslo.si) in jo povezali do članka. Kaj menite? Primer je Petra Majdič. --Domen 09:54, 24 marec 2007 (UTC)
Smo sedaj dogovorjeni? --Domen 16:32, 17 april 2007 (UTC)
Ja očitno, da smo, ker se use že spreminja v dogovornjeno obliko. --Sporti 15:23, 28 maj 2007 (CEST)

Kategorija navedkov[uredi]

Zanima me, ali naj navedke ljudi damo pod kategorijo Kategorija:Navedki/Ljudje ali pod Kategorija:Ljudje? Po moje je bolj primerno drugo, ker drugih navedkov tako ni (razen kakšne revije oz. časopisi). --Domen 09:41, 16 december 2006 (UTC)

Ni potrebe, ker bomo to tako ali tako kategorizirali, ko bomo imeli recimo ~7000, 10000 navedkov. Torej pustimo kot je. --Pasji pozdrav 12:32, 16 december 2006 (UTC)
Kaj in kako bomo kategorizirali? Ni lažje 2.500 člankov kategorizirati ZDAJ kot 8.000 člankov potem? --Domen 14:09, 16 december 2006 (UTC)

User:Dinybot, a bot flag request[uredi]

Hello, I would like to ask for the bot flag for the Dinybot robot. It is a classical global automatic interwiki robot which operates at all Wikiquotes. Demonstrative editations are available. Also specification in English is available. Simple specifiation follows:

  • Bot Operator: User:Martin Kozák
  • Aim of the Bot: Periodical automated completing and keeping of the interwiki links of all projects.
  • Language used: The Python
  • Script used: Python Wikipedia Robot Framework
  • Already used on:
    1. Czech Wikipedia for automated typographic corrections, code cleanups and redirects replacing, (Lightweight MediaWiki Robot Framework, since 2006-05-11)
    2. Czech Wikiquote for typographic correction, code cleanups and redirects replacing, (Lightweight MediaWiki Robot Framework, since November 2006)
    3. Wikiversity projects for completing and keeping the interwiki links. (Python Wikipedia Robot Framework, since March 2007, in pending)

Thanks for Your complaisance.

--Martin Kozák 15:53, 28 marec 2007 (UTC)

You need to request for bot flag on Meta-Wiki. I support you. --Domen 14:13, 30 marec 2007 (UTC)
OK, I'll wait maybe one or two weeks and then I'll put my request there and write here a link. Thanks! --Martin Kozák 19:46, 30 marec 2007 (UTC)

Dvojni navedki[uredi]

Pravkar sem v članku Jacques Audiberti in Jacques Rigaut opazil enak navedek. Bi mogoče kdo vedel, kateri komu pripada? --Domen 09:30, 27 maj 2007 (CEST)

Dalí[uredi]

Lepo prosim, če se navedki iz Salvador Dali spremenijo na Salvador Dalí z í - ker je tak zapis edini pravi in bo tako tudi povezava z wikipedijo direktna. Hvala.--Amazone7 13:40, 8. november 2007 (CET)

Prijava[uredi]

Po dolgi odsotnosti bi rada kaj malega prispevala, pa sem pozabila geslo in se torej ne morem prijaviti. Kaj naj storim? Uporabnik Iva

Če si vpisala geslo, lahko zahtevaš novo, drugače se pa ponovno registriraj. --Domen 20:07, 31. december 2007 (CET)

2.500[uredi]

Imamo že 2.500 člankov z navedki! --Domen 12:52, 20. februar 2008 (CET)

Opla, malo sem počistil z napačnimi poimenovanji in jih je zdaj točno 2,499 . Hinko Gnito 18:57, 22. marec 2009 (CET)

Tukaj so kandidati za hitro brisanje: http://sl.wikiquote.org/wiki/Kategorija:Kandidati_za_hitro_brisanje. -Ta nepodpisani komentar je dodal/-a Hinko Gnito (pogovorprispevki) 19:58, 22. marec 2009‎.

Juhej! Ponovno: http://sl.wikiquote.org/wiki/Kategorija:Kandidati_za_hitro_brisanje. -Ta nepodpisani komentar je dodal/-a 93.103.212.206 (pogovorprispevki) 15:00, 7. november 2009.

Avtorske pravice ...[uredi]

Kako je z avtorskimi pravicami na Wikinavedku? Če bi npr. prepisal prevedene citati iz neke slovenske zbirke citatov (npr. Hudičev slovarček) ali bi bilo to kršenje avtorskih pravic (četudi bi navedel vir). In koliko takih navedkov je dovoljeno prepisati (cele knjige menda ne ...)?--Wailer 15:03, 9. december 2008 (CET)

500 slovenskih pregovorov[uredi]

Ravno brskam po časopisu Illyrisches Blatt na Digitalni knjižnici Slovenije, pa sem naletel na zbirko 500 slovenskih pregovorov (iz leta 1823, mind you). Bi to bolj pasalo sem ali v Wikivir in ali se da komu prepisat? Jaz si ne upam na pamet posodabljat takratnega zapisa šumnikov. Tu je link; če slučajno ne dela, gre za 11. številko z dne 18.3.1832. --Yerpo 09:09, 16. marec 2009 (CET)

Turški fuzbal[uredi]

Vtipkal sem www.misli.com pa mi pokaže:

http://www.maraton.com.tr/

Moj ali širši problem.Hinko Gnito 16:58, 26. marec 2009 (CET)

Nekdo je shekal nisli--Andrejj 17:47, 26. marec 2009 (CET)!??

Zanimivo, ker opoldan je še čist OK delalo. Hinko Gnito 18:45, 26. marec 2009 (CET)

Jaz sem bil na tej strani registriran uporabnik in sem danes dobil e-mail z njihove strani, kjer med drugim piše:..."Spoštovani uporabnik spletne strani www.misli.com. Obveščamo vas, da je spletna stran začasno ukinjena in bo v roku 1 meseca preseljena na novo spletno stran www.cangura.com."...(T@Di iz wikipedije) 86.58.90.16 20:13, 29. marec 2009 (CEST)

Slog navedkov[uredi]

Zelo zaželjeno bi bilo, če bi se navedki zapisovali v navadni, ne ležeči pisavi. Veliko lažje je brati in prej vidiš kakšne ključne besede.

Pa še: na Glavni strani je napačno zapisano: "prosti spletni zbirki 2.447 navedkov!" Pravilno bi bilo: "prosti spletni zbirki navedkov 2.447 avtorjev!" Ali kako drugače. --Janezdrilc 20:47, 26. december 2011 (CET)

EleferenBot[uredi]

Hello, I am operator of a bot EleferenBot, and would like to have the bot flag.

--Eleferen (pogovor) 20:13, 13. april 2012 (CEST)

Nov administrator[uredi]

Glede na to, da na projektu trenutno ni nihče dejaven, predlagam, da uporabniku Janezdrilc podelimo administratorske pravice. --Domen (pogovor) 01:41, 17. maj 2014 (CEST)

Wikidata Phase 2 is here[uredi]

Hey,

(Sorry for writing in English. I hope someone can translate this for me where necessary.)

Today the ability for all Wikiquotes to query and access the data available in Wikidata has been enabled. This will open the opportunity for all Wikiquote's to start sharing the same data as other languages as well as other projects. You can read up on the Lua implementation of Wikidata at this page which includes basics of how to query the data and display certain properties. This section may also be of use to the community.

If you have any questions d:Wikidata:Wikiquote is a good place to find help.

Thanks, John F. Lewis (talk) 20:48, 10. junij 2014 (CEST)

Media Viewer is now live on this wiki[uredi]


Media Viewer lets you see images in larger size

Greetings— and sorry for writing in English, please translate if it will help your community,

The Wikimedia Foundation's Multimedia team is happy to announce that Media Viewer was just released on this site today.

Media Viewer displays images in larger size when you click on their thumbnails, to provide a better viewing experience. Users can now view images faster and more clearly, without having to jump to separate pages — and its user interface is more intuitive, offering easy access to full-resolution images and information, with links to the file repository for editing. The tool has been tested extensively across all Wikimedia wikis over the past six months as a Beta Feature and has been released to the largest Wikipedias, all language Wikisources, and the English Wikivoyage already.

If you do not like this feature, you can easily turn it off by clicking on "Disable Media Viewer" at the bottom of the screen, pulling up the information panel (or in your your preferences) whether you have an account or not. Learn more in this Media Viewer Help page.

Please let us know if you have any questions or comments about Media Viewer. You are invited to share your feedback in this discussion on MediaWiki.org in any language, to help improve this feature. You are also welcome to take this quick survey in English, en français, o español.

We hope you enjoy Media Viewer. Many thanks to all the community members who helped make it possible. - Fabrice Florin (WMF) (talk) 23:54, 19. junij 2014 (CEST)

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

IMPORTANT: Admin activity review[uredi]

Hello. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc) was recently adopted by global community consensus (your community received a notice about the discussion). According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on smaller wikis. To the best of our knowledge, your wiki does not have a formal process for removing "advanced rights" from inactive accounts. This means that the stewards will take care of this according to the new admin activity review here.

We have determined that the following users meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for more than 2 years):

  1. Darko Pes (administrator)

These users will receive a notification soon, asking them to start a community discussion if they want to retain some or all of their rights. If the users do not respond, then their advanced rights will be removed by the stewards.

However, if you as a community would like to create your own activity review process superseding the global one, want to make another decision about these inactive rights holders, or already have a policy that we missed, then please notify the stewards on Meta-Wiki so that we know not to proceed with the rights review on your wiki. Thanks, Rschen7754 01:33, 29. julij 2014 (CEST)

Letter petitioning WMF to reverse recent decisions[uredi]

The Wikimedia Foundation recently created a new feature, "superprotect" status. The purpose is to prevent pages from being edited by elected administrators -- but permitting WMF staff to edit them. It has been put to use in only one case: to protect the deployment of the Media Viewer software on German Wikipedia, in defiance of a clear decision of that community to disable the feature by default, unless users decide to enable it.

If you oppose these actions, please add your name to this letter. If you know non-Wikimedians who support our vision for the free sharing of knowledge, and would like to add their names to the list, please ask them to sign an identical version of the letter on change.org.

-- JurgenNL (talk) 19:35, 21. avgust 2014 (CEST)

Process ideas for software development[uredi]

’’My apologies for writing in English.’’

Hello,

I am notifying you that a brainstorming session has been started on Meta to help the Wikimedia Foundation increase and better affect community participation in software development across all wiki projects. Basically, how can you be more involved in helping to create features on Wikimedia projects? We are inviting all interested users to voice their ideas on how communities can be more involved and informed in the product development process at the Wikimedia Foundation. It would be very appreciated if you could translate this message to help inform your local communities as well.

I and the rest of my team welcome you to participate. We hope to see you on Meta.

Kind regards, -- Rdicerb (WMF) talk 00:15, 22. avgust 2014 (CEST)

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

Grants to improve your project[uredi]

Apologies for English. Please help translate this message.

Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants program is accepting proposals for funding new experiments from September 1st to 30th. Your idea could improve Wikimedia projects with a new tool or gadget, a better process to support community-building on your wiki, research on an important issue, or something else we haven't thought of yet. Whether you need $200 or $30,000 USD, Individual Engagement Grants can cover your own project development time in addition to hiring others to help you.

Meta RfCs on two new global groups[uredi]

Hello all,

There are currently requests for comment open on meta to create two new global groups. The first is a group for members of the OTRS permissions queue, which would grant them autopatrolled rights on all wikis except those who opt-out. That proposal can be found at m:Requests for comment/Creation of a global OTRS-permissions user group. The second is a group for Wikimedia Commons admins and OTRS agents to view deleted file pages through the 'viewdeletedfile' right on all wikis except those who opt-out. The second proposal can be found at m:Requests for comment/Global file deletion review.

We would like to hear what you think on both proposals. Both are in English; if you wanted to translate them into your native language that would also be appreciated.

It is possible for individual projects to opt-out, so that users in those groups do not have any additional rights on those projects. To do this please start a local discussion, and if there is consensus you can request to opt-out of either or both at m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Thanks and regards, Ajraddatz (talk) 19:04, 26. oktober 2014 (CET)

Global AbuseFilter[uredi]

Hello,

AbuseFilter is a MediaWiki extension used to detect likely abusive behavior patterns, like pattern vandalism and spam. In 2013, Global AbuseFilters were enabled on a limited set of wikis including Meta-Wiki, MediaWiki.org, Wikispecies and (in early 2014) all the "small wikis". Recently, global abuse filters were enabled on "medium sized wikis" as well. These filters are currently managed by stewards on Meta-Wiki and have shown to be very effective in preventing mass spam attacks across Wikimedia projects. However, there is currently no policy on how the global AbuseFilters will be managed although there are proposals. There is an ongoing request for comment on policy governing the use of the global AbuseFilters. In the meantime, specific wikis can opt out of using the global AbuseFilter. These wikis can simply add a request to this list on Meta-Wiki. More details can be found on this page at Meta-Wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on m:Talk:Global AbuseFilter.

Thanks,

PiRSquared17, Glaisher

— 18:36, 14. november 2014 (CET)

VisualEditor coming to this wiki as a Beta Feature[uredi]

VE as BetaFeature.png

Hello. Please excuse the English. I would be grateful if you translated this message!

VisualEditor, a rich-text editor for MediaWiki, will soon be available on this wiki as a Beta Feature. The estimated date of activation is Wednesday, 26 November.

To access it, you will need to visit the Preizkusne funkcije page after the deployment and tick the box next to "VisualEditor". (If you have enabled the "Samodejno omogoči vse betamožnosti" option, VisualEditor will be automatically available for you.) There will also be a "Jezikovno orodje VisualEditor" that you can enable if you need it.

Then, you just have to click on "Uredi" to start VisualEditor, or on "Uredi kodo" to edit using wikitext markup. You can even begin to edit pages with VisualEditor and then switch to the wikitext editor simply by clicking on its tab at any point, and you can keep your changes when doing so.

A guide was just published at mediawiki.org so that you can learn how to support your community with this transition: please read and translate it if you can! You will find all the information about the next steps there. Please report any suggestions or issues at the main feedback page. You will also receive the next issues of the multilingual monthly newsletter here on this page: if you want it delivered elsewhere, for example at your personal talk page, please add the relevant page here.

Thanks for your attention and happy editing, Elitre (WMF) 19:12, 21. november 2014 (CET)

VisualEditor coming to this wiki as a Beta Feature (errata)[uredi]